| |
In the year seven
after winning the competition
Since Anna Malikova won 1993 the 1st prize at the ARD
Competition, the first time in 12 years that this prize was awarded, her
career has been skyrocketing. When one meets her for the first time it
is difficult to imagine how she can muster much strength at the piano,
as she is a tiny and descreet, almost shy person. However, when the conversation
turns to music, her eyes quickly show fire and the fragile person of her
changes into a powerful pianist, who knows exactly what she wants.
While reading the biography of the today 35 years old pianist one is surprised
to find her still so young, as it is filled with so many events and episodes.
But we wanted to know how it was at the very beginning, wanted to know
exactly about details of her life. "Probably it was with me like
it is often the case: both my father as well as my mother played the piano.
Eventually they wanted me to have my own share" she explains
with simplicity. But both her parents are professional musicians, both
studied at the conservatory of Tashkent and tought in Anna's home town
Tashkent. On the other side there was no urge from them to develop a professional
base. However there was an early key event: "One day - I was six
years young - my father took me to a concert, where we met a colleague
of his. She was teaching at the Special Music School in Tashkent and asked,
whether I had an interest to have lessons there." This was sort
of laying the foundation, as it was at this type of music school, where
early preparations could be made for a professional music education later
on. The best students of these special schools from all over the former
USSR were always sent to Moscow. "I was lucky to have Tamara Popovich
as teacher", explains Anna Malikova. But Tamara Popovich had a reputation
of being extremely demanding, far more than anybody else. "When I
was only 14 years, I was already being sent to Moscow. I remember that
I was surprised to find out, that Moscow was such a huge city of such
a large international scale - compared to Tashkent. Of course in Moscow
one found the best pedagogues, musicians, actors, dancers. And of course
this is important for the development of a young artist. Anyway, when
I arrived there, I could barely believe my eyes."
Once in Moscow, she was accepted by the legendary Lev Naumov to join his
class. What was so special about Naumov? Malikova: "Even today
do I believe, that I could not possibly have found a better teacher. I
am not merely referring to his teaching method, but also to his wealth
of emotions and his personality in general. Actually I am even feeling,
that only today do I begin to understand really the depth of all his advice,
and only now do I realize the genius of his ideas and thoughts. Probably
I adapted what he said at that time, but understanding in depth comes
only now and gradually." Naumov had been for many years the assistant
of Heinrich Neuhaus, who is considered the father of the russian piano
school. Naumov has many years ago decided not to appear anymore on stage
and has devoted himself totally to the life of a pedagogue. "If
you really love teaching so much, then the result of being that consequent
can lead to better results than if you would move back and forth between
concert platform and classroom", the pianist believes today.
He had at times up to 30 students and also his former students come now
and then to play for him and get his advice. The situation is like that
until today.
To have to leave from home at the age of 14 was difficult for Anna Malikova:
"I was not that type who found easy contact to other people, and
I was pretty shy. My mother was afraid, that I would not stand living
alone in such a big city and had told me, that she would bring me back
at once, should I call her. But Moscow was for me a miracle: even only
three or four days after my arrival I felt already like at home."
However, life at the boarding house of the school and later in the guesthouse
for students was all but easy - and this had to be her home for the coming
12 years. And what about the competition between schoolmates, was it tough?
"It became sort of tough later, in the conservatory, but not in
the Central Music School. Once in the conservatory, the only aim for everybody
was to take part in international competitions. The system was like that:
first you had to audition within the conservatory and then, if you proved
good enough, you were sent to the republics to perform there. The final
remainder had eventually the chance to be sent to an international competition."
But Anna Malikova remembers as well all difficulties. The state had never
big funds available and the number of young pianists admitted to a competition
was accordingly very small: "Mostly three or four at a time."
Of course, this made the competition among comrades only tougher. In the
end she was educated five years at the Central Music School by Naumov,
then five years at Tchaikovsky Conservatory. The following two years after
that she did her "aspirantura" [= doctorate] and finally she
was four years assistant of Naumov. A long time, but she says today: "For
me it was really a wonderful time."
The first concert, as she remembers, she gave at the age of eight - "a
concerto by Kabalevsky with orchestra in Tashkent." When only
13 years old, she played the 3rd piano concerto by Prokofiev also in her
home town, even before she began to study with Naumov. Her teacher Popovich
had the opinion that once you wanted to play the piano it made more sense
to study seriously for the stage instead of playing tunes for grammy.
These first public performances were after all rewarding enough. Later
however, she had to undergo the crucifying procedures of playing in competitions,
as everybody else had to. "Seven years I tried to be admitted
to international competitions, however in vain. I only was permitted to
audition and to play in the Soviet Union. Of course this was frustrating,
but today I believe that this had also its good side. I gained strength
and the will to succeed against all odds. And on the other side, if you
win an important competition too early, you have usually not enough repertory,
not enough experience. Very, very often does it happen that young winners
of competitions disappear after some time, as they are not able to withstand
permanent pressure."
However, one day she made it to gain the upper hand in the system and
she was sent abroad. To Oslo, Warsaw and Sydney. But there was not to
be a first prize, although she made it into the finals of each of these
competitions. And then, finally, came the collapse of the soviet system
and the fall of the iron curtain. "All of a sudden everything
was different. The prizes of the above mentioned competitions were not
sufficient to help me start a career. Therefore I decided once more to
try a competition. And then I realized, that each coin has two sides.
Although the soviet system was hard for us artists, we could also get
a lot of help: once we were admitted and sent to a competition, everything
was organized and paid for. We did not have to do anything else than concentrate
on performing. Now we were suddenly free, we could do everything - but
we had no money. Today many people say: What happened with the russian
piano school? It went down a lot.' But I am convinced, that many a gifted
student just does not have the financial means to study or to go abroad."
Eventually Anna Malikova used some savings and went to the ARD Competition
München on her own expenses.
And it worked. She won it in 1993 and is the only pianist in 12 years
that was awarded first prize in this highly important competition. Was
this the begin of her career? "Definitely yes. In the following
years I have played really very much, 50 to 60 concerts in one year, which
is for me very much, as I am physically almost not able to play more,"
she comments, estimating herself well. Life now was very different from
before. "I understood quickly that it is very tiring to have a
solo career. The reason: I do not like very much to play the same program
over and over again, as I would lose vitality. It is not interesting when
you have to play the same program too many times in a row or when you
change only one work of a program at a time. If you want to be a serious
professional, you need time, time to prepare new repertory and new programs.
There are pianists who need more, other less..." However, in
1993 she had a bigger variety in her repertory,than this had been possible,
had she won the prize some years earlier. "Additionally, I was
more self confident. I did not anymore have in my head only the ideas
of my teachers, but was able to develop my own thoughts. It helped probably,
that I was at that time already teaching myself for four years, which
I believe has helped me considerably with my own artistic development."
Then she was still based in Moscow and was travelling from there, "with
all the difficulties with regard to obtain visas," as she is
recalling. She stayed in Moscow and at the conservatory until 1996 and
then moved to Germany. "It was possible to continue to teach,
but I was travelling so much that I did not feel comfortable anymore,
as I was so to say taking away the place of some other assistant, who
needed it more," she says with reference also to the needs of
her teacher Naumov.
In the meantime Anna Malikova has made a number of recordings for the
italian label Real Sound. One finds most of the important works of Chopin,
but also works by Liszt and Schubert on these CD. It seems, that she has
after all a preference for romantics or russian music of the 20th century.
"When I was a small girl, I loved very much Chopin and Liszt,
a little later Bach and Mozart. Then it was Schubert and still later I
began to like Ravel. Then I discovered Shostakovich and Prokofiev, or
to put it into other words: the works of these composers found their way
into my understanding. Today it is hard to say what I really like most.
There are so many genius styles or composers... I think that a musician
should be universal. In a way it makes it difficult that there is such
a huge amount of repertory. What I want to say: even if you would really
like to play some music it does not mean automatically that you should
or even could play it." With the sonatas by Beethoven she still
wants to have more time - they figure on the list however. "There
are some works, which I would like to play, however cannot. For instance
I cannot play a full decime chord, my hands are just too small for that.
Why should I then play works which other pianists can do so much better?
This is my physical limit."
In her play one does not realize this problem, as it is powerful and intense.
The Beethoven sonatas shall come definitely, as she has already played
concertos by Beethoven a number of times.
Asked for her favorite pianists, she mentions Gould and Koroliov as Bach
players, Perahia for Mozart, Sofronitsky for Scriabin. "It is
difficult to define exactly which pianist is my favorite. There are so
many who play certain works specially wonderfully, although they are truly
universal artists." On the other side she insists, that her own
interpretations are coming from within herself and are expressing her
individual emotions, without depending on somebody else's ideas. If one
listens to her recordings, one will find this convincingly confirmed.
|